1. Understanding of AI Application (25 points)

Criteria	Exemplary (23–25)	Proficient (19–22)	Developing (14–18)	Beginning (0–13)
Medical Problem Identification	Clearly and accurately identifies the specific medical problem with detailed context	Accurately identifies the medical problem with adequate context	Identifies the medical problem with limited context	Incorrectly identifies or provides vague description of problem
AI System Description	Provides comprehensive, accurate description of how AI works, including data sources and training process	Provides accurate description of AI system with some details about data and training	Provides basic description with minimal detail about how AI works	Description is inaccurate, incomplete, or demonstrates misunderstanding
Technology Type	Correctly identifies AI technology type(s) and explains how each applies to the case	Correctly identifies technology type(s) used	Identifies technology type but may have minor errors	Incorrectly identifies or cannot identify technology types

2. Analysis of Outcomes and Impact (20 points)

Criteria	Exemplary (18–20)	Proficient (15–17)	Developing (11–14)	Beginning (0–10)
Benefits Identification	Identifies 3+ specific, significant benefits with clear explanation of each	Identifies 3 benefits with adequate explanation	Identifies 2–3 benefits with limited explanation	Identifies fewer than 2 benefits or explanations are vague
Effectiveness Analysis	Provides specific data on AI accuracy/effectiveness and interprets meaning	Discusses effectiveness with some specific information	Mentions effectiveness generally without specific data	Does not adequately address effectiveness
Comparison to Traditional Methods	Insightfully compares AI to traditional methods, explaining specific improvements	Compares AI to traditional methods with adequate detail	Basic comparison with limited detail	Weak or missing comparison

3. Critical Analysis (25 points)

Criteria	Exemplary (23–25)	Proficient (19–22)	Developing (14–18)	Beginning (0–13)
Limitations/Risks	Identifies 2+ significant, specific limitations with explanation of why each matters	Identifies 2 limitations with adequate explanation	Identifies 1–2 limitations with limited explanation	Identifies fewer than 2 limitations or explanations are superficial
Ethical Considerations	Demonstrates sophisticated understanding of multiple ethical issues with nuanced analysis	Identifies relevant ethical concerns with adequate analysis	Identifies basic ethical concerns with limited analysis	Minimal or absent ethical analysis
Human-AI Collaboration	Clearly explains how humans and AI worked together with specific examples	Explains human-AI collaboration adequately	Basic explanation of collaboration	Unclear or incorrect explanation

4. Personal Reflection and Application (20 points)

Criteria	Exemplary (18–20)	Proficient (15–17)	Developing (11–14)	Beginning (0–10)
Trust Assessment	Provides thoughtful, well-reasoned position on trusting AI with clear supporting evidence	States position with adequate reasoning	States position with limited reasoning	Opinion stated without supporting reasoning
Accountability Analysis	Demonstrates sophisticated understanding of accountability issues with nuanced reasoning	Identifies appropriate accountability with adequate reasoning	Basic accountability discussion	Superficial or absent accountability analysis
Improvement Suggestions	Proposes realistic, specific improvements that demonstrate deep understanding	Proposes adequate improvements or expansions	Proposes basic improvements with limited detail	Vague or unrealistic improvement suggestions

5. Connections and Critical Thinking (10 points)

Criteria	Exemplary (9–10)	Proficient (7–8)	Developing (5–6)	Beginning (0–4)
Community Impact	Insightfully connects to local community with specific, realistic examples	Connects to community with adequate examples	Basic community connection with limited detail	Weak or missing community connection
Additional Applications	Identifies multiple relevant medical problems for AI with clear reasoning	Identifies relevant medical problems adequately	Identifies basic applications with limited reasoning	Cannot identify appropriate applications
Inquiry Skills	Asks 3+ thoughtful, probing questions demonstrating curiosity and understanding	Asks 2–3 relevant questions	Asks 1–2 basic questions	Questions are absent or not relevant

Additional Assessment Criteria

Communication and Presentation (Bonus – up to 5 points)

• Exceptional clarity and organization (+5 points)
• Clear writing with good organization (+3 points)
• Adequate clarity (+1–2 points)
• Unclear or disorganized (0 points)

Scoring Summary

Category	Points Possible	Points Earned
Understanding of AI Application	25
Analysis of Outcomes and Impact	20
Critical Analysis	25
Personal Reflection and Application	20
Connections and Critical Thinking	10
Subtotal	100
Communication Bonus	5
Total Score	105

Performance Levels

• Advanced (90–100): Demonstrates exceptional understanding of AI healthcare applications with sophisticated critical analysis and insightful connections
• Proficient (80–89): Demonstrates solid understanding with adequate analysis and appropriate connections
• Developing (70–79): Demonstrates basic understanding with limited analysis; needs more depth
• Beginning (Below 70): Demonstrates minimal understanding; requires significant support and revision

Teacher Comments and Feedback

Strengths:

Areas for Growth:

Next Steps:

Student Self-Assessment (Optional)

Before submitting, rate yourself in each area:

Understanding of AI Application: Excellent Good Needs Work

Critical Thinking: Excellent Good Needs Work

Ethical Analysis: Excellent Good Needs Work

Personal Reflection: Excellent Good Needs Work

What I’m most proud of in this work:

What I would improve if I had more time: