Lesson 3: AI Ethics - Fairness and Bias in Algorithms
Case Study Investigation Presentation (Total: 100 points)
| Criteria | Excellent (4) | Proficient (3) | Developing (2) | Beginning (1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understanding of System (20 points) |
Clear, thorough explanation of AI system's purpose, function, and scale. Demonstrates deep understanding. | Good explanation of AI system. Covers main points with minor gaps. | Basic explanation of AI system. Missing some important details. | Unclear or incomplete explanation of AI system. |
| Bias Identification (20 points) |
Precisely describes bias with specific examples and data. Explains what groups were affected and how. | Clearly describes bias with some examples. Identifies affected groups. | General description of bias. Limited examples or specificity. | Vague or incomplete description of bias. |
| Root Cause Analysis (20 points) |
Identifies multiple sources of bias with clear explanations of how each contributed. Shows understanding of systemic factors. | Identifies 2+ sources of bias with good explanations. Understands main causes. | Identifies 1-2 sources of bias. Explanations are basic or incomplete. | Struggles to identify or explain root causes of bias. |
| Impact Assessment (15 points) |
Describes multiple specific harms with examples. Connects to broader societal issues. Shows empathy and understanding. | Describes several harms clearly. Makes some connections to broader issues. | Describes basic harms. Limited detail or connection to bigger picture. | Minimal or unclear description of impact. |
| Solutions & Recommendations (15 points) |
Proposes multiple specific, realistic solutions. Shows creative and critical thinking. Addresses prevention and remediation. | Proposes several reasonable solutions. Shows good thinking and understanding. | Proposes basic solutions. May be vague or incomplete. | Solutions are unclear, unrealistic, or missing. |
| Visual Communication (5 points) |
Engaging, clear visuals that enhance understanding. Professional and well-organized. | Good visuals that support content. Generally clear and organized. | Basic visuals. May be unclear or poorly organized. | Visuals missing, confusing, or unhelpful. |
| Presentation Skills (5 points) |
Clear, confident delivery. Good pacing. All members participate equally. | Clear delivery. Adequate pacing. Members participate. | Sometimes unclear. Uneven participation or pacing issues. | Difficult to understand. Poor participation or timing. |
| Time Management (5 points) |
3-4 minutes, well-paced throughout. | Within time range, mostly well-paced. | Slightly over/under time or rushed. | Significantly over/under time. |
"Why AI Fairness Matters" Essay (1-2 pages, Total: 100 points)
| Criteria | Excellent (4) | Proficient (3) | Developing (2) | Beginning (1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thesis & Focus (20 points) |
Clear, compelling thesis about AI fairness. Essay stays focused throughout. Strong personal perspective. | Clear thesis statement. Essay mostly stays focused. Some personal perspective. | Thesis present but may be weak or unclear. Focus wavers at times. | Thesis missing or very unclear. Unfocused essay. |
| Use of Evidence (25 points) |
Uses 3+ specific examples from case studies. Clearly explains how examples support argument. Shows deep understanding. | Uses 2-3 examples from case studies. Connects examples to points made. | Uses 1-2 examples. May not fully explain relevance or connection. | Few or no specific examples. Vague references only. |
| Critical Thinking (25 points) |
Analyzes multiple perspectives. Makes thoughtful connections between cases. Shows nuanced understanding of complexity. | Shows good analysis. Makes some connections. Considers different viewpoints. | Basic analysis. Limited connections or perspective-taking. | Mostly summary rather than analysis. Little critical thinking evident. |
| Personal Reflection (15 points) |
Thoughtful personal reflection on importance of AI fairness. Clear connection to own role/responsibility. Authentic voice. | Good personal reflection. Shows thought about own connection to topic. | Some personal reflection. May be superficial or brief. | Little or no personal reflection. Purely academic tone. |
| Organization & Structure (10 points) |
Clear introduction, body, conclusion. Smooth transitions. Logical flow of ideas. | Good structure. Mostly smooth transitions. Ideas flow logically. | Basic structure. Some organizational issues or choppy transitions. | Poor organization. Hard to follow. Weak or missing introduction/conclusion. |
| Writing Quality (5 points) |
Very few errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation. Varied sentence structure. Strong vocabulary. | Minor errors that don't interfere with meaning. Generally good writing. | Several errors. May interfere with clarity at times. | Frequent errors that interfere with understanding. |
Individual Worksheet Completion (Total: 50 points)
| Criteria | Excellent (4) | Proficient (3) | Needs Improvement (1-2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completeness (10 points) |
All questions answered thoroughly and completely. | Most questions answered. Some may be brief. | Many questions incomplete or missing. |
| Understanding (15 points) |
Answers demonstrate deep understanding of case. Accurate, detailed responses. | Answers show good understanding. Generally accurate. | Answers show limited understanding or contain significant errors. |
| Critical Analysis (15 points) |
Goes beyond basics. Makes connections. Shows critical thinking in analyzing causes and solutions. | Shows some analysis and critical thinking. Mostly goes beyond surface level. | Mostly surface-level responses. Limited analysis or critical thinking. |
| Evidence & Examples (5 points) |
Uses specific evidence and examples from case study to support answers. | Uses some evidence and examples. | Few or no specific examples. |
| Writing Quality (5 points) |
Clear, well-written responses. Few errors. | Generally clear writing. Some errors. | Unclear writing or many errors. |
Individual Participation Throughout Lesson (Total: 25 points)
| Criteria | Excellent (5) | Proficient (3-4) | Needs Improvement (1-2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engagement | Actively engaged throughout lesson. Listens attentively. Asks thoughtful questions. | Generally engaged. Listens and participates appropriately. | Often disengaged or distracted. |
| Contributions | Makes multiple meaningful contributions to discussions. Offers insights that advance conversation. | Participates in discussions. Makes relevant contributions. | Rarely participates or contributions are off-topic. |
| Respect | Always respectful of others' views. Builds on others' ideas. Creates safe space for discussion. | Generally respectful. Listens to others. | Sometimes disrespectful or dismissive of others. |
| Critical Thinking | Questions assumptions. Considers multiple perspectives. Shows depth of thought. | Shows some critical thinking. Considers different viewpoints. | Little evidence of critical thinking or perspective-taking. |
| Collaboration | Excellent group member. Contributes equally. Helps others. | Good group member. Does fair share of work. | Poor group participation or collaboration. |